Appendix 1 and 2
Appendix 1: Tent Encampments – Operational Method Statement
Purpose
This appendix sets out the council’s standard operational approach to managing tent encampments. It explains how cases are identified, how engagement and enforcement are undertaken, the legal routes available, and the indicative timescales involved. It is intended to provide transparency and ensure a consistent and proportionate approach across the city. These methods statements are provided as a framework, but are subject to change and adaptions, for example based on welfare need, resources available and community safety.
Key principles
The council’s approach to tent encampments is based on the following principles:
Process
Stage 1: Initial report and verification (Day 0–2)
Reports of tents are received and verified by council officers. Details are recorded and shared with outreach services to enable early engagement and support.
Stage 2: Initial welfare engagement and notice (Week 1)
A first visit is undertaken by the Encampments Coordinator and relevant land manager.
Stage 3: Follow‑up engagement (Week 2)
A second visit is undertaken if the tent remains.
Stage 4: Final visit and notice of intention (Week 3)
A third visit is undertaken.
Stage 5: Clearance or escalation
If the site is
vacated, clearance is arranged.
If individuals remain, the case may be escalated to legal action by
the relevant land manager.
Legal routes
Where voluntary resolution is not achieved, the council may use the following legal powers (or others as available / appropriate):
Indicative timeframe
Flexibility
The
council’s approach is welfare‑led, and timescales are
indicative rather than fixed.
They may be extended where individuals are engaging with services,
where safeguarding issues are identified, or where there is a
realistic prospect of moving individuals into accommodation or
support. This flexibility is an important aspect of ensuring that
enforcement action is proportionate and compliant with legal
duties.
Appendix 2: Vehicle Encampments – Operational Method Statement
Purpose
This appendix sets out the council’s standard approach to managing vehicle encampments. It explains the enforcement process, associated legal powers and indicative timescales, and how welfare considerations are incorporated at key stages.
Key principles
The approach to vehicle encampments is based on:
Process
Stage 1: Report and verification
Reports are received and logged. A process server or enforcement agent is instructed to verify occupancy and record vehicle details.
Stage 2: Service of notice (Section 77[SC1] ) or other appropriate notification of intent to commence legal proceedings as agreed by the officers
Where appropriate, a Section 77 notice (Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994), or other appropriate notification of intent to commence legal proceedings as agreed by the officers is issued requiring vehicles to leave. A welfare letter is also provided, offering information on support services.
Stage 3: Decision to escalate
If vehicles
remain, the council reviews whether to escalate enforcement.
This involves:
Stage 4: Court application (Section 78) or other court application as is deemed most expedient to the situation.
Where escalation
is justified, an application is made to the Magistrates’
Court under Section 78 / or other court application as is deemed
most expedient to the situation.
A court summons is served ahead of the hearing[SC2] .
Stage 5: Court hearing and order
If granted, a court order requires vehicles to leave within a specified period.
Stage 6: Enforcement and removal
If vehicles do
not comply, enforcement action is undertaken.
Vehicles may be removed, stored and ultimately disposed of if not
reclaimed.
Legal routes
The main legal powers used are:
Indicative timeframe
Flexibility
Timescales are indicative and may be extended where appropriate. This includes where welfare concerns are identified, where individuals are engaging constructively with services, or where voluntary resolution is being pursued. This reflects the council’s commitment to a balanced approach that combines enforcement with support.
[SC1]Do we want to keep open the option of “ or other appropriate notification of intent to commence legal proceedings as agree by the officers”. We Could use Part 55 on vehicles ( we do a lot). At the moment we are limiting our powers. We will have the PSPO’s coming and newcomer injunctive relif etc. As currently phrased we bind our hands to one route. We are wide open to a JR
[SC2]I can reword this is we agree the principals.
[SC3]Repeating myself but I don’t want to limit to one route.