Agenda item - BH2020/00776 - 6 Princes Crescent, Hove - Full Planning

RECOMMENDATION – GRANT

Ward Affected: Westbourne

1.    It was noted that an in-depth presentation had been provided by officers in advance of the meeting and was included on the council website detailing the scheme by reference to site plans, elevational drawings and photographs which also showed the proposed scheme in the context of neighbouring development. The main considerations in the determination of this application relate to the principle of the demolition/dismantlement and subsequent development; the design and appearance of the proposed dwellinghouse and the impact it would have on the historic significance of heritage assets in the vicinity; and the impact on the amenities of local residents. Consideration is also given to the potential impact on the adopted highway and on local biodiversity.

Speakers

2.    Ward Councillor Appich addressed the committee and stated that the applicant had struggled to remain within Planning guidelines and could have built the previously approved scheme. The new design appears to deal with neighbour’s objections. The committee were requested to grant permission for the application.

3.    The Planning Manager informed the committee that the report contained an error at paragraph 8.13 which should read Conservation Areas not Listed Building.

4.    The Senior Solicitor confirmed that the affect on the nearby listed building was still relevant.

Questions for Officers

5.    Councillor Fishleigh was informed that the dormer windows would have obscure glazing as they serve hallways only.

6.    Councillor Shanks was informed that the policy relating to demolition did not apply to the application. The case officer and the Heritage Team received confirmation of the justification for demolition from applicant as materials were to be used in the new building.

7.    Councillor Theobald was informed that the cobbled wall will be replaced as part of the proposed conditions.

Debate

8.    Councillor Henry stated they were against demolition; however, they were comforted by the report and Heritage work undertaken.

9.    Councillor Theobald agreed that the demolition of the existing building was a shame, however, they supported the application.

10. The Chair invited the Committee to vote: On a vote of 8 to 2 Planning permission was granted.

11. Resolved: That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out in the report and resolves to GRANT planning permission subject to the Conditions and Informatives in the officer’s report.