Agenda item - BH2020/02557- 13 Pembroke Crescent, Hove - Householder Planning Consent

RECOMMENDATION – GRANT

Ward Affected: Westbourne

            Erection of a single storey detached garden room outbuilding to rear (Part-retrospective)

(1)              It was noted that an in-depth presentation had been provided by officers in advance of the meeting and was included on the council website detailing the scheme by reference to site plans, elevational drawings and photographs and aerial photographs which also showed the proposed scheme in the context of neighbouring development. The main considerations in determining this application related to the deign and appearance of the development, the potential impacts on the amenities of local residents, on the character or appearance of the conservation area on the smooth running of the adopted highway and on the health of the large tree in the neighbouring garden. The proposed use of the outbuilding as a modest home office by persons living in the main dwelling house. It was not considered that the scale of the development would any level of additional activity that could be considered harmful to the amenities of local residents. The council would retain the authority to investigate under the Environmental Protection Action Act 1990, should any noise complaints be received. It was also not considered that the proposed use would result in significant footfall and approval was therefore recommended.

Questions of Officers

(2)              Councillor Theobald sought clarification regarding the excavation which had taken place in the rear garden as it seemed excessive in view of the modest structure proposed. Also asking whether the site was subject to flooding. It was confirmed that much of the excavation which had taken place was historic and had resulted in the garden being levelled. Councillor Theobald also sought clarification of the size of the structure proposed.

Debate and Decision Making

(3)              Councillor Bagaeen stated that had concerns that the site could be prone to flooding due to its swampy nature and was also concerned that the apparent lack on landscaping would be detrimental to neighbouring amenity. He did not feel able to support the application.

(4)              Councillor Henry stated that he considered the proposal was modest and as such was acceptable. He supported the officer recommendation.

(5)              Councillor Yates concurred stating that it appeared that the proposed use would be subsidiary to the main dwelling.

(6-)       A vote was taken and the 8 Members present when the vote was taken voted by 7 to 1 that Planning Permission be granted.

71.4      RESOLVED – That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out in the report and resolves to GRANT Planning Permission subject to the Conditions and Informatives also set out in the report.